School board approves payment of RHS batting facility
by Krystin Fain
Nov 12, 2009 | 1459 views | 7 7 comments | 12 12 recommendations | email to a friend | print
On Tuesday, school board members debated long and hard before a standing-room only crowd to decide the future of a batting facility at Rockmart High School.

The board ultimately decided to uphold the controversial decision to pay the remaining balance on the batting facility at a total of $37,671.06.

At the special session on Oct. 27, Rockmart High School submitted a request to the board to pay the remaining balance—approximately 1/3 of the total cost—on the facility. The motion carried 7-1, with member Tara O’Neal voting no.

At Tuesday’s meeting, however, the matter was placed on the budget for discussion once more due to a concern of parliamentary procedure regarding the last decision.

Following much discussion, the board voted 4-5 to resend the motion of payment—not enough to overturn the decision to pay the loan. Some parents and concerned taxpayers at the meeting were outraged, while others expressed relief at the decision.

The issue:

At the Oct. 11, 2006 regular session of the Polk County Board of Education, former superintendent Darrell Sorrells recommended the board give permission for the Booster Club to proceed with the project. On that date, the Rockmart High School requested to build an indoor batting facility at the school and to proceed with plans for the project in order to start fundraising and design of the facility.

According to the approved minutes of that meeting, the Booster Club would finance all of the costs for the facility. Bettie Fay Lewis made a motion, seconded by at least 5 others, to approve the recommendation, and the motion carried unanimously.

According to several comments at Tuesday’s meeting, unnamed individuals allegedly took out personal loans to fund the construction of the facility, and have failed to raise the remaining money through fundraisers and the like.

Following the 7-1 decision to pay the remaining balance on Oct. 27, parents and taxpayers raised concerns regarding the decision, citing the legal implications of a school board paying a personal loan.

Is it legal?

According to the district’s lawyer, Mike York, the payment of a personal loan is not an acceptable use of SPLOST funds. Monies from Unbudgeted Funds may be used for such a purpose, but only because the payment will address an asset on the county’s property.

“We better be sure we’re swimming in the right water,” said board member Harold Wingfield. “When it comes to tax money, can a school board assume a private debt?”

Where will the money come from?

The money used to pay off the balance will be drawn from the Unbudgeted Funds account, a separate allotment of money that has yet to be assigned a purpose within the district. At the end of the fiscal year, the unspent money from this account rolls over into the school district’s General Fund, which is used to pay substitute teacher salaries and bus repairs, among other things. The General Fund is not a part of SPLOST.

“We have hit tough times and we will certainly need that $37,000 for other things before it’s all over,” said member Grady McCrickard. “Does the board have the money to pay for the facility? Yes. But are they going to need that money down the line? Yes.”

Why not SPLOST?

The Special Local Option Sales Tax, or SPLOST, must be passed by a county commission and voted on by locals in a referendum. The school’s SPLOST projects must be approved, and the district is required to provide an independent accountant’s report on the way the funds are allocated. Because the RHS batting facility is not on the docket for this year’s SPLOST projects, the money cannot be used.

What will happen now?

Some members of the board expressed concern that, if not paid, the facility could become property of the bank, causing issue due to its location on Polk School District property. The facility will be completely owned, maintained and operated by the school district and Rockmart High School.

The board’s decision to pay the loan is far from fair, say some parents, board members and concerned Polk citizens.

“You don’t have money to compensate for furloughs, lack of raise or more textbooks,” asked Cedartown parent and special speaker Lori Parish. “But you do have money to spend on personal loans with taxpayer’s money for unapproved projects?”

Other parents attended the meeting to support the school board’s previous decision. Parents donned Rockmart baseball t-shirts, and the RHS Lady Yellow Jackets fast-pitch softball team was also in attendance. Parents often verbally agreed when members said that the district should be thankful for the efforts of Rockmart’s Booster Club.

Lewis asked, “Doesn’t every student deserve the same facilities? If there’s anyway we can make this happen we should do it. We owe it to Rockmart.”

Cedartown High School’s newly completed girl’s athletic field house also has an indoor batting cage for the baseball and softball teams. The new field house was built from a donation from the W.D. Trippe foundation, a charity that serves to assist ‘deserving services’ by matching funds, erecting structures and establishing programs to residents of Cedartown.

“Rockmart doesn’t have a W. D. Trippe,” said Lewis.

Member John Stone, after a failed motion to table the matter pending further research, suggested that the group pay back the Board, or at least match the board’s contribution.

“This is the second time we’ve bailed out a Rockmart group of parents who couldn’t raise the funds they promised. We have to keep this from happening again.”

“They could have gone through the proper channels and we could have voted on it as a SPLOST project,” said O’Neal. “But they chose to take out these loans and now they are asking us to pay for them. Some of our schools don’t have enough books for their kids.”

In response, member Charles Thaxton said, “Sports educate our children, too.”

“This is not a Rockmart versus Cedartown issue,” said O’Neal. “It’s a funds issue. With paycuts and furloughs, this money can be used for something else. ($37,000) is a Polk County teacher’s salary. It’s two ParaPros’ salaries.”

“I consider this a bargain for the school system,” said member Andy Fairel. “They have covered more than 2/3 of the cost of this facility.”

Member Tommy Sanders, Lewis, Stone, Fairel, and Thaxton voted not to resend the vote. Chair Jane Holbrooks, O’Neal, McCrickard, and Wingfield voted to resend.

The next Polk School District Board of Education special session meeting will be Tuesday, Nov. 17 at 5:30 p.m. at the central office for the purpose of the superintendent’s evaluation, use of facility, and family medical leave request. The public is invited to attend.
comments (7)
« cstdwebeditor wrote on Monday, Nov 16 at 10:45 AM »
Reminder - you may not make inflammatory, libelous or profane comments. Such comments may be removed.
« LoriParish wrote on Friday, Nov 13 at 01:17 PM »
Well I was at the meeting- I was the speaker - Lori Parish. Cedartown is being treated as the "red headed step child." The members of the Board from Rockmart vote the way they do just because they don't have a Trippe Foundation, then somehow they get Johnny Stone to swing from Rockmart. Rockmart High School got their new school right away with new stadium and other athletic facilities. When our school was built in Cedartown did we not have games over on West Avenue. And by giving the $37K to Rockmart - they have opened the door to practically bankrupt themselves by giving to other booster groups. I am going back to the meeting and again ask for $37K for the Cedartown Marching Band and when they refuse me - I will scream discrimination - because we are from Cedartown and because we are not an athletic group. EVERY booster club should go ask for money - they cannot possibly turn you down - just to be fair. That is not about the Trippe Foundation or otherwise.

How about these numbers below (Public Record - FYI)

Custodian Salary $71.39 for 8 hours X 3 days = $214.17

Parapro Salary $73.72 for 8 hours X 3 days = $221.16

Board Member $75.00 for 3 meetings (maybe 6 hours) = $225.00 (plus they get "extras"

So... it takes a custodian or parapro 24 hours to make what a board member makes in 6 hours. PLUS the custodian and Parapro had to take furlough days and got no raises - the Board has made NO EFFORT to reduce their income.

For the 2009 year Board Members have gotten from the least amount of $2979.75 up to the highest of $6433.90.

It was also pointed out in the meeting that restrooms at CHS Stadium are not ADA Compliant - it was approved at the December 5, 2006 meeting to erect new facilities including concession and press box - this was approved with the SPLOST III Referendum - to be completed for the 2007 - 2008 school year. Ummm didnt happen. The new fence -- Trippe Money/ new ticket booths - Trippe Money - Girls Facility - Trippe money. So is Trippe the Bailout for the Board of Education??? No we are fortunate to be receipents of this. But that does not give the BOE permission to discriminate against the Cedartown Students.

Fourth grade teachers do not have enough textbooks to send reading books home. These are children in the "building block" time of learning. And that is not just fourth grade students in Cedartown - that is COUNTY wide. As of November 12 there was a $160K balance in the unbudgeted funds. Next year when they dont give raises or dont help out on furloughs or when your kids/ grand-kids dont have textbooks - now you will know why - go learn how to bat a ball. That is where the money went. Education seems to lack as much importance as shallow promises and athletics.
« ladyhidenseek wrote on Thursday, Nov 12 at 03:42 PM »
justme1007 Were you at the meeting? Maybe you should read my comments again. I didn't say it wasn't "well written". I said that IN MY OPINION it was embellished and written for dramatic effect. I sat through the board meeting both listening and taking my own notes. I'm saying that the meeting did not go down as the article was written. I know what was said---and the sequence of the comments. For anyone who didn't attend the meeting...it's not really an accurate account. Sorry if neither of you can accept what I've said here, but it's my opinion.
« justme1007 wrote on Thursday, Nov 12 at 03:35 PM »
I agree with Listen UP completely. Maybe you should read the article again. Possibly revisit the minutes as they were written. I for one, think the article is very well written and the subject address properly.
« ladyhidenseek wrote on Thursday, Nov 12 at 02:58 PM »
"Listen UP", I did read the article. I'm not sure why I would want to review the minutes of the meeting since I was present--more especially why I would need to read minutes from the first meeting. My comments were directed at the writer's rendition of Tuesday night's meeting. In my opinion the article is embellished and the facts arranged for dramatic effect. We could have only wished that the meeting had been as exciting as the article! I get the feeling that I've hit a nerve.....
« Listen UP wrote on Thursday, Nov 12 at 02:38 PM »
You should go back and read the article very carefully and slowly, maybe even get a copy of the minutes from both meetings. Then you might be able to make a sensible comment.
« ladyhidenseek wrote on Thursday, Nov 12 at 01:31 PM »
Wow! I'm going to have to comment on the reporting of this article. I attended the meeting personally, and while there is truth to this article the facts have been twisted a bit, well actually a lot. Yes, the meeting began with a standing-room only crowd which I can only assume had to do with business discussed prior to the hitting complex since over half of the crowd left before the hitting complex was discussed. Perhaps Krystin Fain (reporter) became distracted later on because the matter of referring to the request as a "bail out" was clarified. According to the clarification in NO WAY has anyone "failed" to pay or has it been determined that the payments are in jeopardy at this point. Also, fragments of board members comments have been spliced together. For example, the quote from Tara O'Neal was actually taken from two seperate occasions when she requested to comment. O'Neals comments (quoted above) were not all said together, at the same time..... I have seen people question the integrity of Fish Wrap articles before and I can say that in this particular instance the facts have definetly been arranged-- for dramatic effect perhaps, but definetly arranged!
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.