Polk schools respond to AYP this year
by Krystin Fain
Oct 28, 2009 | 928 views | 9 9 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
The finalized results recently arrived on the county’s Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) reports from the Georgia Department of Education, and Polk School District can certainly be proud of the results.

As required under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, each of Polk’s schools, along with the district as a whole, is evaluated on year-to-year student achievement based on statewide assessments. 8 of Polk’s 10 schools made AYP this year, and Superintendent Marvin Williams credits the accomplishment with everyone involved.

“We are making progress as we continue to put forth effort,” he said. “Everyone is doing their part and our kids and teachers are showing that they are just as bright as other students and teachers across the United States.”

According to an update presented at October’s regular PSD board meeting, all elementary schools in Polk School District met AYP measurements for reading/language arts, mathematics, and attendance.

Van Wert Elementary School will remain in Needs Improvement 1 for 2009-2010 school term due to Goodyear’s previous AYP status, but will be removed from that list if AYP is met in the spring.

Cedartown High School and Cedartown Middle School met the AYP measurements in all areas, and do not advance in their Needs Improvement status. Both schools will remain in their respective categories until AYP is met in the spring.

Rockmart High School and Rockmart Middle School did not meet the AYP measurements, but Williams believes that both schools are on the right track to succeed in the coming months.

“We are extremely proud of our students and teachers,” he said. “But of course, our goal for next year is 100 percent of our schools making AYP.”

The Polk School District is making great strides to meet that goal, said Laurie Atkins, through various programs like Intercession and Renaissance, as well as a recent district-wide transition to ‘standards based education’.

“Intercession is a chance for struggling students to receive extra assistance from teachers before their next evaluation,” Williams commented. “We really want to focus on those areas where we’ve been unsuccessful, and this is a good way to do that.”

These students are invited to attend scheduled workshops that allow them to work one-on-one with teachers and discuss ‘problem areas’ before their next evaluation. Intercession was most recently held this month, and the administration has seen stellar results from these events.

Renaissance takes the incentive program from the business world and applies it to education in an attempt to motivate all students to strive for excellence with a new commitment to their academic endeavors.

While the Renaissance program has been adopted countywide, each school’s theme and reward system varies. The purpose of Renaissance is to recognize students who are achieving academic excellence with tangible incentives, rewards, and recognition to promote academic excellence.

Both Williams and Atkins are optimistic and cites the improved AYP scores this year as proof that the program is indeed effective in improving the motivation and morale of students and teachers alike.

“Renaissance is efforts-based,” said Atkins. “It is ultimately a recognition and rewards program for both teachers and students.

Polk Schools will be expected again to meet and exceed AYP standards for next year, and with accomplishment percentages on an ever-increasing scale (all schools must meet a 100 percent pass rate by 2013), schools in Polk County will be expected to perform even better next year. Through existing programs and the continued effort of teachers and students, however, schools in Polk County are certainly on the right track.
comments (9)
« anonymous wrote on Saturday, Oct 31 at 10:42 PM »
Demodog - I have always struggled with the correct usage of said word, and you are sexist!!!! (just kidding... all in good humor here). I really do appreciate CONSTRUCTIVE critiquing, it shows me the correctness. (L.D. here....)

I AM AN ALUMNA of RHS!

I don't understand why it's always "their" fault when students don't succeed. Never the students, because everyone's child is perfect...

Parents get mad when teachers are hard on students in order to prepare them for college, but when they are easy on them parents get mad. I just don't understand.
« Demodog wrote on Saturday, Oct 31 at 03:38 PM »
"Anonymous" is actually an alumnus but I only point that out since I am a CHS Grad. He made many good points about educators and I'm sure the folk he named were/are really good teachers just as mine were. I'm not a teacher but some of my favorite folks are and I really appreciate him defending them. I am WRONG, they don't need defending but I certainly do appreciate and thank him for his remarks. Back to the alumni thing - I guess I'm a sexist because I assumed that "anonymous" was a male, so if it is Ms Anonymous make that alumna.
« anonymous wrote on Friday, Oct 30 at 09:14 PM »
I am an alumni of RHS. Even though they haven't made AYP I don't think the problem is in the tenured teachers, or the administration. I had some of the BEST teachers there that actually prepared me for college: Mr A Gifford, Mrs R Teems, Mr G Teems, Mrs L Dohla, Mrs Rae Smith, Mrs L Thompson, Ms Flanagan, Mrs Dover, and the list goes ON! Those EDUCATORS prepared me for college. They should not suffer just because AYP hasn't been met. First of all, take a good long hard look at the students. Yes there are a handful of good, smart students but there are a LOT of LAZY students who really don't care. Before you lay the blame on the educators, make sure your children are actually paying attention in class, doing their homework, studying, and putting forth an effort. Get mad if you want to, I really don't care. Take it easy before you throw blame all on the educators. It isn't an easy profession at all, especially for the pay. You can't please everyone.......
« RHSgraduate wrote on Friday, Oct 30 at 08:48 PM »
This is my first time to respond to a post on here, but felt the need to do so. I have had four children graduate from RHS. My two daughters continued on to graduate from college with a four year degree. My two sons are enrolled in college and getting a four year degree. The teachers you are talking about are the same ones that taught my children and prepared them for the next four years of school. Just because a school does not make AYP does not make the teachers at that school not good teachers. There are many reasons a school does not make it.. My hats off to the teachers at RHS, Mrs.Treadaway, Mrs.Williams, Mr. Johnson and to Mr. Marvin Williams
« kmulls wrote on Friday, Oct 30 at 03:13 PM »
I noticed that Rockmart High School did not make AYP again within four years, although I will admit that it did twice within that span. Has it ever occurred to you that the administration and tenured teachers (being there for at least four years) are issues there? Due to people being in the area for a long time and not wanting to change, those kids are being cheated out of what they really deserve: a real education. I noticed this when I went to speak to my kids' teachers after school one day. Considering who the administrators are, the only things that they care about are putting money in their pockets and possible other illegal things that may be going on behind closed doors. Here's my recommendation for advice to the Polk BOE: terminate the administration and tenured teachers and never see that they work in education again at any level. If you want Polk County to be successful, then you must be willing to change...NOW.
« opin_r_l_a wrote on Thursday, Oct 29 at 07:27 PM »
I'm sure you didn't have a problem with that money being spent, while the softball building was being built either! Fast forward to now Rockmart's getting somethings so your petty crap comes out. Well Rockmart pays taxes also and at least we paid for most of our building what did you contribute to yours?
« TKAfall91 wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 08:55 PM »
Several years ago, a group of Rockmart parents went to the school board and asked for permission to build an indoor softball / baseball batting facility. At the time, they described to the board members that they would raise all the money for the complex themselves. The group received many donations in material and labor from the supportive parents and community that offset most of the costs. When the facility was complete a balance of approximately $80,000 remained. The people / parents that brought this idea for in front of the board signed a personal note borrowing the $80,000 from a lending institution. The school board approved their request and agreed to maintain the facility once built.

Fast-forward 4 years, a balance of $39,000 remains on the note these parents signed. Last night our school board was asked to pay off this balance. Why, might you ask, because the board paid $55,000 of the new girl’s softball complex at CHS out of SPLOST funds. You might think, what’s fair is fair, right?

Well, I for one think NOT! The superintendent is not sure if we can pay off this note out of the SPLOST (because it was a personal loan). If the funds to pay this note are not available through the SPLOST then the money will come from “General Funds”. Furthermore, no parents from CHS committed any of their own personal funds to build such a facility. This debate is all about personal responsibility. If you commit to doing something and sign your name on the dotted line then you should expect to pay.

Now, if Rockmart wants $55,000 worth of SPLOST fund money, then present a worthy project to the Board and build it. But, if they use “General Funds” to pay this debt off and my child has to share a textbook because the school system “has no money” then that is a tragedy! Our School Board voted last night to payoff this debt. Furthermore, if the money can not be taken from the SPOLST fund, they will pay it off with General Funds. Only one Board member voted against this measure. I recommend you call your School Board Member and tell them NOT to use GENERAL FUNDS to payoff someone else’s DEBT!

« AtticusFinch wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 05:38 PM »
While the readers appreciate hearing about whether or not the schools met AYP, I'm wondering where the information about the recent shake-up in the middle schools is. Apparently, for 9 weeks our children have been following schedules that are not funded (to the tune of $500,000). To me, this is something that the taxpayers should know and the "newspaper" should cover. Over the intercession, the schedules of almost all students were changed, and the students received new classes. Now, some students are having to sit through the same material that they had last nine weeks because they have a new teacher for the class. Since this happened at both RMS and CMS, this is clearly a system-wide issue. Isn't this the type of problem that we are paying the county office to avoid in the first place?
« AtticusFinch wrote on Wednesday, Oct 28 at 05:37 PM »
While the readers appreciate hearing about whether or not the schools met AYP, I'm wondering where the information about the recent shake-up in the middle schools. Apparently, for 9 weeks our children have been following schedules that are not funded (to the tune of $500,000). To me, this is something that the taxpayers should know and the "newspaper" should cover. Over the intercession, the schedules of almost all students were changed, and the students received new classes. Now, some students are having to sit through the same material that they had last nine weeks because they have a new teacher for the class. Since this happened at both RMS and CMS, this is clearly a system-wide issue. Isn't this the type of problem that we are paying the county office to avoid in the first place?
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.