Lack of water remains an issue for Jud Brazier Road residents
by Melody Dareing
Feb 18, 2013 | 6316 views | 16 16 comments | 17 17 recommendations | email to a friend | print
April Fincher addresses the Polk County Water Authority during a recent meeting. (Melody Dareing/The Polk Fishwrap)
April Fincher addresses the Polk County Water Authority during a recent meeting. (Melody Dareing/The Polk Fishwrap)
slideshow
More than 40 people attended a recent meeting of the Polk County Water Authority to ask that water be provided to their rural land near Esom Hill.

The room was tense as residents challenged the board, some with tearful statements. At one point, police intervened to calm the situation and prepared to take people out of the room.

“I want my water. I’m not going to let it go,” said April Fincher, a Jud Brazier Road resident.

The board’s chairman said the authority was doing all it could do.

“We did want to put water up that mountain. We do. We really do,” said Harold McDurmon, chairman of the Polk County Water Authority.

McDurmon cited the estimated $600,000 that it would cost to bring water to that area as a roadblock. Authority members said they couldn’t justify spending that amount of money to provide water to eight to ten houses.

“We have also checked for opportunities for future growth or development in that part of the county, such as planned subdivisions, industry or businesses, apartments, or other projects that might help to justify the spending, but there are none,” Water Authority General Manager Jack Damron said in a prepared statement released at the meeting.

Fincher and others made strong accusations against authority board members and Damron during the Feb. 11 meeting.

Fincher said 2007 authority minutes show the board made an agreement with her late husband, Chad, to set aside money for water in the area.

The board voted in December 2008 to halt the monthly contribution to the project and the board dissolved the special line extension altogether in 2012.



“You lied in the newspaper saying there was no written or verbal agreement,” Fincher said. “There is a written agreement. It’s in your minutes.”

Damron and McDurmon explained after the meeting that residents did not have a formal, signed agreement regarding the 2007 approved project, so the authority is not legally bound by their meeting minutes. The board has the discretionary authority to change its mind about any project, the men said.

Damron said the authority, finding itself cash-strapped, decided to end the project and move the money saved for Jud Brazier water lines to what it considered to be more advantageous projects.

Damron said the terrain surrounding the Jud Brazier Road area made it impossible for the authority to guarantee the minimum of 20 pounds of water pressure, which could ultimately affect the county’s other 8,900 customers.

“We can’t risk taking water that far and then we can’t get you water. We risk all the customers,” McDurmon said.

However, Jud Brazier area David Fincher said the authority offered to put in lines at his home for $54,000 with the guarantee of proper water pressure. He said it was one mile to the nearest county water source.

Dusty Crile said the authority offered to install water lines to his home if he paid $42,000 for 4,200 feet of line. Crile said he didn’t understand the cost since the authority has water lines running to Alabama residents just a few miles past his property.

Damron and McDurmon said water has been supplied to some in Alabama since the early 1990s. They didn’t know how many Alabama residents are on Polk County water and don’t know how that project was funded.

Damron said the cost of running lines per customer depends on the terrain, elevation and the cost of materials. He said it is provided on an “at cost” basis.

Damron said in his prepared statement the authority has offered to install a meter at a nearby home of a water customer on the county system that would make water available to the Finchers, but they turned that offer down.

The authority also offered to provide the family with a water meter for a nearby fire hydrant at a discounted cost. A promissory note was issued for the remaining cost of the meter, Damron said.

Water from the hydrant could be used to fill tanks that the Finchers would be able to transport to their property as needed, he explained.

Damron said the Finchers never made any payments toward the meter and had to return it.

(Editor's clarification: The Cedartown Standard was contacted by the water authority on Wednesday, Feb. 20 in reference to the statement above. The water authority stated Wednesday that the Finchers did make initial payments on the meter, but those payments did not continue, resulting in the return of the meter.)

Damron said running out of water is a risk taken by those living in rural areas.

“We understand this is an emotional issue for families without water. But private wells that go dry, especially in elevated areas of the county, are a common occurrence and beyond the control of the water authority,” Damron said.

The Polk County Water Authority does not receive tax money. Water customer fees collected by the authority are used to operate the organization.

The members of the Polk County Water Authority are not elected, rather they are appointed by the Polk County Board of Commissioners and serve five-year terms.
Comments
(16)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
chattylady
|
February 28, 2013
Aw...I think I hit a nerve with THEGATOR...this issue is important...VERY important not only to the people that need water on Jud Brazier, but should be important to all of Polk County residents as well. How many times does someone have to explain that this isn't just about the need for water but is now about a need for accountability with the PCWA. I have seen documents supporting all of the claims made and I hate to say it but the PCWA looks like they aren't very truthful.
chattylady
|
February 27, 2013
Maybe THEGATOR is a relative or close friend of someone at the PCWA or maybe THEGATOR is just playing the devil's advocate. It's funny that THEGATOR has not replied to this post since COUNTYRD told them who she was. Hmmm...something seems fishy here.
THEGATOR
|
February 27, 2013
TO chattylady. Maybe you are 100% wrong about THE GATOR. It could be that he is tired or all the lies and bs being told on this website and facebook and want to move on to more important things.
countyrd
|
February 27, 2013
thanks for the support chattylady...as for THEGATOR is wasnt too hard to figure out who it most likely has to be and I am so not worried about them I have bigger fish to fry then someone who attempts to play both sides of the fence...

THEGATOR
|
February 22, 2013
To countyrd; I told you that I was not an employee of PCWA which is true. I do know some of the board members. They are honest, sincere and dedicated people. Do I trust and respect all board members, NO. I know why one member is on the board and it is not to serve the customers of Polk County water.I know that there was never a written agreement between the water authority and people on Jud Brazier rd. to run a water line in that area. Now, was there a verbal agreement, I do not know. Have lies been told? YES. I am sorry for the loss of your friend or family member.

At the PCWA meeting in Feb.,many things were said by the speakers. The board members were called thieves and crooks and many other bad things. One speaker even said that there was a special place in hell for the board members. One of the speakers said that Mr. Jack Damron caused the death of the late Mr. Chad Fincher. These are some very vicious comments. In the near future,I hope everyone in Polk County has county water.
countyrd
|
February 25, 2013
To THEGATOR..you do not have to refer to me as countyrd this is April Fincher!While I do not blame the PCWA for the death of my husband I do feel that they are partly responsible for the extra stress he was under due to their lies and withholding of information that WE needed to know and should have known...If PCWA is so pitful and innocent then why have they continued to lie about so much? Are there decent board memebers maybe but if they are then why not make Damron tell Chad and I the truth from the beginning? Would we still have been upset yes but it would not be the mess it is now...Did the PCWA members inform you on how upset they were with the commissioners for allowing water to be brought to my house the morning of Chads death? Despite everything that has happened that was just in very bad taste..What about the statement that they recieve no tax payer funds..again that is a lie they maynot recieve a certain regualr amount but all you have to do is go pull news articles about monies given to PCWA for projects that state the funds came from SPLOST(TAX PAYERS)and other monies that come from the county commissioners are also sometimes OUR tax dollars but yet I have no right to speak out? Were harsh things stated in last meeting YES but why should I or anyone else be held accountable when PCWA seems do to whatever it pleases and no one is willing to stand up to them and hold them accoutable...Why are they allowed to discrimnate againist me and not be held accoutable? They made 2 separate offers to 2 of my neighbors that stated if they paid a large amount of money the PCWA would run them water well why did PCWA not offer me the same deal even if mine would have been more? Why should it matter if some of the ones at meeting on my behalf stated harsh words? Nobody cared that PCWA acccused my late husband of stealing water, or that pcwa general manager did what he could to have chad locked up 2 days before he passed, or that the day chad died the pcwa wanted to complain about commissioners stepping up to have water brought to my children and I on the day we lost a great husband and father...At this point my children and I getting county water is not even issue anymore..So defend them all that you wish but you nor many others know this situation as well as I do..All of this chaos could have been avoided if those board memebers would have gotten up and checked into some of what I was trying to tell them and not listening to everything coming form damron and mcdurmons mouth!!! I am sure I have not handled everything properly but so what why should I be held accountable if I have made mistakes? PCWA handles many things in a un-proper way and no one holds them accountable and they are serving the county/citizens..if you ever want to sit face to face and debate this with me please give me a call and I will gladly bring you up to speed on the whole situation dating back to 2007 up to present day
lisa41m
|
February 25, 2013
I am the speaker that told them there was a special place in hell for them. I am Chad's sister. And what was said was that they would soon know what it was like to be with out water because there was a special place in hell for each of them. Yes i meant. For anyone to refuse water to anyone &yes we all know they can get it to them, they have no hearts. Like April said its about the lies now. They have told so many lies about my brother & we will not stop until they are all gone. They made it personal & we will finish there job. You say they are honest people we have proof that is a lie,we would love to meet with you & show you the proof....how can you say there was no agreement??? If the minutes, a signature 5 or 6 people saying that it was of the up most importance to get the people of jud brazier rd water. What does an agreement have to be? I thought when you signed a paper saying you were going to do something no matter if it was on a,napkin it was still a contract?? Guess things are different when people thing they are above the law. But i promise we wasn't stop till they are brought down.
THEGATOR
|
February 20, 2013
TO countryrd. First, I am not an employee of PCWA. Second if you read the correction in the Standard, You will read that the reporter did not correctly quote Mr. Damron as far as Ms Fincher making a payment on the meter. The reporter corrected what she said. Mr Damron said that Ms. Fincher did make payments on the meter. Third, If you read the minutes of 2007 PCWA meetings, you will see that at no place was that money dedicated to the Jud Brazier project.I hope every one in Polk County get county water.This whole issue blew up when the county commissioners got involved. The PCWA board is appointed by the county commssioners. If the county commissioners think they can run the water authority better that the authority board, I think they should take it over.I don't think they can. I agree with you when you said ths goes much deeper that most people know. I think it may go way beyond the water authority operation. I believe that this is politics at the worst.
lisa41m
|
February 21, 2013
Fist off the only reason the went back and repost anything was because April posted proof that mr damron had lied to the paper & the reason why the payments stopped was because they took the meter from them. Yes they said they were I'm breach of the contract & she asked then while they were LESS than a mile reading other meters to please come read that one. See my brother was so sick he could not lift that meter nor was he allowed on PCWA property he died less than a week later. Bottom line PCWA should not have as much power ass they do to say who gets watt &who doesn't if it was not a personal vendetta against my brother & his family then why offer it to other families out there but not to his???? All we ever wanted was questions answered but they never seem to want to do that. All they had to do was just say hey things are tight we can't do what we said we would us right now but we are working on it please give us time. But they chose to lie & tell lies on my brother & we will not stand by & allow then to get by with this. We buried one & they may bury another but like crick said two more will be here to take our place.
countyrd
|
February 21, 2013
The statement by the reporter does not say that SHE did not correctly quote Damron it states Damron contacted them and restated...there is a difference..He only did that after he seen the proof posted on facebook and the payments only stopped when they got the meter back..He also previously accused Chad Fincher of stealing water for the last 6 years which is also another lie but believe them if you wish that is how I can tell you have to affiliated with him even if you are not employed with them...This issue has been blowed up for awhile now with or without the commissioners follow the story and you would have known that:

(Editor's clarification: The Cedartown Standard was contacted by the water authority on Wednesday, Feb. 20 in reference to the statement above. The water authority stated Wednesday that the Finchers did make initial payments on the meter, but those payments did not continue, resulting in the return of the meter.)

THEGATOR
|
February 19, 2013
Maybe the polk county water authority members should be fired and repaced with county commissioner then the government will be in charge. I know much has been said about the Jud Brazier road problems. If a agreement was reached between the board and these people, why don't they show it to the newpaper and print it on facebook. I have read the minutes of the 2007 meetings and find no promises by the water authority to give these people water.If you have time, call the newpaper and ask them if these people called board members any names.
countyrd
|
February 20, 2013
You must be an employee of PCWA...It is very evident either you are or you are affilated with them...This all goes deeper then water for the jud brazier rd area do your research and you would know that...It is in the minutes as it also stated that they were to keep them updated which they also did not as well as in the above article it is also stated by Damron that no payments were ever made on the portable water meter by the finchers and the returned checks are posted on facebook to prove other wise...Take a count of how many lies have been told by whom...

Read more: The Fish Wrap - Lack of water remains an issue for Jud Brazier Road residents
countyrd
|
February 20, 2013
Below is PCWA statement they gave to reporter and the finchers never stated that there was a legal bound agreement just that there was a verbal and written agreement and that PCWA denied it for months until just now see below...

***(Damron and McDurmon explained after the meeting that residents did not have a formal, signed agreement regarding the 2007 approved project, so the authority is not legally bound by their meeting minutes. The board has the discretionary authority to change its mind about any project, the men said.

Damron said the authority, finding itself cash-strapped, decided to end the project and move the money saved for Jud Brazier water lines to what it considered to be more advantageous projects.)***

Read more: The Fish Wrap - Lack of water remains an issue for Jud Brazier Road residents
Lakecreek
|
February 18, 2013
Its obvious that the water authority needs to be governed by the county. Just as power is regulated by the state, I believe water should be governed by the county. As a county program taxes could be used to settle matters that are beyond the scope of the water authorities current powers. We can do without allot of things but water is not one of them.
Demodog
|
February 18, 2013
A Public Utility with Government oversight is not good.
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.